UK Corporate Governance Code
UK Stewardship Code
The Lab
Accounting and Reporting
CRR sections
CRR Reviews of Corporate Reporting
Enforcement
Professional Oversight
Current Actuarial Standards
Consultations
Who is JFAR?
JFAR Risk Perspective
Oversight of the Actuarial Profession
Audit and Assurance
Our Expectations
Pre-appointment Meetings
Audit Quality Review
Latest Developments in Audit report
Corporate Governance
Stewardship
About Us
FRC in Numbers
Work With Us
Making a Complaint
Whistleblowing
Freedom of Information
FRC's Areas of Research Interest
FRC Board, Councils and Committees
Procedures and Policies
FRC Tribunals
67/14
A disciplinary hearing of the Formal Complaint against KPMG LLP, a Member Firm of the ICAEW and Mr James Marsh, a Member of the ICAEW regarding breaches of the Ethical Standards for Auditors in 2011-2012 in connection with Cable and Wireless Worldwide PLC, a former listed audit client of the firm, is listed to be heard on 4th December 2014 at 10.15 am for one day. The hearing relates to the investigation notified in FRC notice (PN047) of 9th May 2013. The Formal Complaint is admitted and the purpose of the hearing is to determine the appropriate sanctions. The hearing will take place at The International Dispute Resolution Centre Limited, 70 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1EU. Notes to Editors:
The FRC is responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance and reporting to foster investment. We set the UK Corporate Governance and Stewardship Codes as well as UK standards for accounting, auditing and actuarial work. We represent UK interests in international standard-setting. We also monitor and take action to promote the quality of corporate reporting and auditing. We operate independent disciplinary arrangements for accountants and actuaries; and oversee the regulatory activities of the accountancy and actuarial professional bodies.
In relation to disciplinary matters, the FRC is the independent, investigative and disciplinary body for accountants and actuaries in the UK dealing with cases which raise important issues affecting the public interest. In brief, the stages of the disciplinary process are:
Decision to investigate
Investigation
Decision whether to bring disciplinary proceedings against Member Firm or Member and, if so decided, referral to Disciplinary Tribunal
Tribunal hearing
Determination and imposition of sanction and/or costs orders
The FRC can start a disciplinary investigation in one of two ways: (i) the professional bodies can refer cases to the FRC; and (ii) the FRC may decide of its own accord to investigate a matter. The Conduct Committee will consider each case identified or referred to it and decide whether or not the criteria for an investigation are met. Investigations are conducted by Executive Counsel and the Professional Discipline team within the Conduct Division. If disciplinary proceedings are commenced, Executive Counsel delivers a complaint to the Conduct Committee. The Conduct Committee then instructs the Convener to appoint a Disciplinary Tribunal.
Disciplinary complaints filed following an investigation are heard by an independent Tribunal which will normally sit in public. If the Tribunal upholds a complaint, there is a wide range of sanctions which it can impose including an unlimited fine, exclusion from membership of a professional body covered by one of the Schemes and withdrawal of practising certificates or licences.