Warning

The content on this page has been converted from PDF to HTML format using an artificial intelligence (AI) tool as part of our ongoing efforts to improve accessibility and usability of our publications. Note:

  • No human verification has been conducted of the converted content.
  • While we strive for accuracy errors or omissions may exist.
  • This content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a definitive or authoritative source.
  • For the official and verified version of the publication, refer to the original PDF document.

If you identify any inaccuracies or have concerns about the content, please contact us at [email protected].

TAC Public Meeting December 2025 Paper 3: SASB Phase 1 Due Process Summary

Logo for the UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee.

Executive summary

Date 9 December 2025
Paper reference 2025-TAC-053
Project Proposed amendments to SASB Standards
Topic Due process summary

Objective of the paper

This paper presents a brief summary of the due process followed in the development of the TAC's comment letters on phase one of the proposed amendments to the SASB Standards issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB).

Decisions for the TAC

The TAC is asked whether it approves the due process summary.

Appendices

Appendix – Due process summary

This paper has been prepared by the Secretariat for the UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to discuss in a public meeting. This paper does not represent the views of the TAC or any individual TAC member.

Due process summary

1The TAC's Due Process Policy (DPP) 1 states that the TAC would usually publish a due process summary for its work developing comment letters. The due process summary should include a conclusion on whether the development of the comment letter complied with the TAC's Due Process Policy, along with an explanation of any noncompliance.

2This due process summary concerns the TAC's project, ‘Proposed amendments to the SASB Standards', which thus far has included producing two comment letters, responding to the ISSB's Exposure Drafts Proposed Amendments to the SASB Standards and Proposed Amendments to the Industry-based Guidance on Implementing IFRS S2. As these comment letters have been developed concurrently as part of the same project, this Summary will cover both outputs.

3The appendix includes a copy of the due process summary.

Questions for the TAC

  1. Does the TAC have any comments on the due process summary in the appendix?
  2. Does the TAC approve the due process summary?

Appendix – Due process summary for 'Proposed amendments to the SASB Standards'

Project initiation

Due process tasks Status Comments
A project management plan, including target timeline, is prepared and approved by the TAC. The project management plan is published on the FRC website. Expected The project management plan was published (Paper 2025-TAC-040) and approved at a public meeting on 16 September 2025. It is available on the FRC website via the above link.

Project delivery, including performing technical analysis

Due process tasks Status Comments
The TAC, and FRC as TAC Secretariat, undertake outreach with UK stakeholders. Expected The FRC as TAC Secretariat undertook outreach with UK stakeholders by identifying key stakeholders and engaging with them via interviews and a roundtable. A public survey was also open for responses for nine weeks. Stakeholders reached included investors, preparers from the nine priority industries, accountancy firms, professional bodies, academics, not-for-profits, and other consultancies.
Draft comment letters with an invitation to comment are prepared, approved by the TAC and published on the FRC website. Optional The TAC decided to undertake a proportionate approach to its consultation response based on time available and the non-mandatory nature of the SASB Standards. Therefore, it decided not to undertake a public consultation. The TAC undertook targeted outreach with UK stakeholders instead.
Research activities are reviewed and noted by the TAC. Optional The TAC Secretariat's research activities included:
  • performing a desktop analysis of the proposed amendments, including the Basis for Conclusions;
  • reviewing available ISSB outputs including staff papers and meetings;
  • assessing relevant third-party commentary and publications; and
  • reviewing selected companies' use of the SASB Standards in their annual reports.
Final comment letters are prepared and approved by the TAC. Mandatory These activities informed the development of the TAC's technical papers, available on the FRC website. The TAC approved the comment letters in Paper 2025-TAC-048 and Paper 2025-TAC-049, subject to amendments discussed in the 11 November TAC meeting.
Final comment letters are submitted to the ISSB or other consultative body and published on the FRC website. Mandatory The final comment letters were submitted to the ISSB once approved. They have also been published on the FRC website.
A stakeholder feedback summary is prepared and approved by the TAC. The stakeholder feedback summary is published on the FRC website. Expected if a draft comment letter has been published for consultation Although the TAC decided not to undertake a public consultation on the draft comment letters, a summary of stakeholder feedback from the roundtable, survey and one-to-one interviews was published (Paper 2025-TAC-047) for the 11 November TAC meeting.

Project closure

Due process tasks Status Comments
A due process summary is prepared and approved by the TAC. The due process summary is published on the FRC website. Expected The TAC tentatively approved the draft due process summary in the 11 November meeting. [The final due process summary was tabled at the 9 December meeting.]
A lessons learnt exercise is performed by the TAC. Optional The TAC performed a lessons learnt exercise at the 11 November meeting private meeting.

TAC meetings

Due process tasks Status Comments
There are a number of requirements in the TAC's ToR relating to meetings, including that:
  • meetings are quorate;
  • recordings are available on the FRC website within 5 working days;
  • agendas and technical papers are agreed by the TAC Chair, circulated to members at least 5 working days in advance and
Mandatory The project was discussed in public meetings held on 8 July, 16 September, 14 October, and 11 November 2025. As of 27 November 2025 (the date of preparing this summary), the meetings have complied with due process. Meetings agendas, technical papers, summaries and recordings, are available on the FRC website. All agendas, papers and recordings were published within the timeframe specified by the TAC's Terms of Reference. An administrative delay meant the summary for the October meeting was published on the FRC website; and
  • summaries are approved by the TAC Chair and published on the FRC website within 10 working days.
published online slightly past the ten working day deadline, at 10:45am on the eleventh working day.

Conclusion

As of 27 November 2025, the development of the comment letter has complied with due process in all material respects.



  1. The TAC's DPP is available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/library/external-groups/uk-sustainability-disclosure-tac/uk-sustainability-disclosure-tac-terms-of-reference/ 

File

Name TAC Public Meeting December 2025 Paper 3: SASB Phase 1 Due Process Summary
Publication date 02 December 2025
Format PDF, 185.7 KB