Warning

The content on this page has been converted from PDF to HTML format using an artificial intelligence (AI) tool as part of our ongoing efforts to improve accessibility and usability of our publications. Note:

  • No human verification has been conducted of the converted content.
  • While we strive for accuracy errors or omissions may exist.
  • This content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a definitive or authoritative source.
  • For the official and verified version of the publication, refer to the original PDF document.

If you identify any inaccuracies or have concerns about the content, please contact us at [email protected].

TAC Public Meeting July 2025 Paper 4: Due Process Summary

Logo for the UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee.

Executive summary

Field Value
Date 10 June 2025
Paper reference 2025-TAC-039
Project Proposed amendments to IFRS S2
Topic Due process summary

Objective of the paper

This paper presents a summary of the due process followed in the development of the TAC's comment letter on the proposed amendments to IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB).

Decisions for the TAC

The TAC is asked whether it has any comments on and approves the due process summary.

Appendices

Appendix – Due process summary

This paper has been prepared by the Secretariat for the UK Sustainability Disclosure Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to discuss in a public meeting. This paper does not represent the views of the TAC or any individual TAC member.

Due process summary

1The TAC's Due Process Policy (DPP)¹ states that the TAC would usually publish a due process summary for its work in developing a comment letter.

2Following the submission of the comment letter on the proposed amendments to IFRS S2 to the ISSB, the final due process summary is tabled for approval in this meeting.

3The appendix includes a copy of the final due process summary.

Questions for the TAC

Does the TAC have any comments on the due process summary in the appendix?
Does the TAC approve the due process summary?

Next steps

4The final due process summary will be published on the FRC website.

Appendix – Due process summary

Project initiation

Due process tasks Status Comments
A project management plan, including target timeline, is prepared and approved by the TAC. The project management plan is published on the FRC website. Expected The project management plan was approved at a public meeting on 13 May 2025 and is available on the FRC website.

Project delivery, including performing technical analysis

Due process tasks Status Comments
The TAC, and FRC as TAC Secretariat, undertake outreach with UK stakeholders. Expected The FRC as TAC Secretariat undertook outreach with UK stakeholders by identifying key stakeholders and engaging with them via interviews and roundtables. Such stakeholders included industry bodies/trade associations, investment management bodies, asset managers, insurers, banks, non-governmental organisations and carbon accounting methodology developers.
A draft comment letter with an invitation to comment is prepared, approved by the TAC and published on the FRC website. Optional The TAC decided not to undertake a public consultation as the comment period was only 60 days and the proposals were targeted amendments. The TAC undertook targeted outreach with UK stakeholders instead.
Research activities are reviewed and noted by the TAC. Optional The TAC Secretariat's research activities included:
  • performing a desktop analysis of the proposed amendments, including their Basis for Conclusions;
  • reading Staff papers and watching ISSB meetings;
  • reviewing and analysing Transition Implementation Group papers and meeting discussions;
  • researching classification systems; and
  • referencing existing disclosures.
These activities informed the development of the TAC's technical papers.
A final comment letter is prepared and approved by the TAC. Mandatory The TAC approved the comment letter at a public meeting on 10 June 2025. The TAC's approval was subject to a number of final comments and the TAC authorised the Chair to resolve any edits arising from those comments.
The final comment letter is submitted to the ISSB or other consultative body and published on the FRC website. Mandatory The final comment letter was submitted to the ISSB and published on the FRC website.
A stakeholder feedback summary is prepared and approved by the TAC. The stakeholder feedback summary is published on the FRC website. Expected if a draft comment letter has been published A standalone stakeholder feedback summary was not prepared as the TAC decided not to undertake a public consultation. However, a summary of stakeholder feedback accompanied the paper with the comment letter that was tabled in the June 2025 meeting: see Appendices 2(a) and 2(b)

Project closure

Due process tasks Status Comments
A due process summary is prepared and approved by the TAC. The due process summary is published on the FRC website. Expected The TAC is asked whether it has any comments on and approves the final due process summary. The final due process summary will then be published on the FRC website.
A lessons learnt exercise is performed by the TAC. Optional The TAC decided not to perform a lessons learnt exercise due to the limited scope of the project.

TAC meetings

Due process tasks Status Comments
There are a number of requirements in the TAC's ToR relating to meetings, including that:
  • Meetings are quorate.
  • Recordings are available on the FRC website within 5 working days.
  • Agendas and technical papers are agreed by the TAC Chair, circulated to members at least 5 working days in advance and published on the FRC website.
  • Summaries are approved by the TAC Chair and published on the FRC website within 10 working days.
Mandatory The project was discussed in meetings on 13 May 2025 and 10 June 2025.

Meetings agendas, technical papers, summaries and recordings, are available on the FRC website.

Due to a technical problem, the last approximately 10 minutes of the June meeting was recorded but not live streamed. However, the recording was then made available on the FRC website.

Overall, the meetings have complied with due process.

Conclusion

The development of the comment letter has complied with due process.



  1. The TAC's DPP is available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/library/external-groups/uk-sustainability-disclosure-tac/uk-sustainability-disclosure-tac-terms-of-reference/ 

File

Name TAC Public Meeting July 2025 Paper 4: Due Process Summary
Publication date 01 July 2025
Format PDF, 174.3 KB